Action Alerts

Cyclist finds flaws in forest travel plan

2009-07-24

Cyclist finds flaws in forest travel plan

July 23rd, 2009, copyright Lewiston Tribune, written by Eric Barker

Alan Deyo, of Orofino, has a favorite motorcycle ride on the Clearwater National Forest.

He starts near Bungalow on the North Fork of the Clearwater River and rides up and across Pot Mountain to Mush Saddle. From there he rides past Cold Springs Peak and Elizabeth Mountain before dropping down to the Black Canyon Road. He rides up Kelly Creek and the Junction Mountain Trail to Windy Ridge and eventually to Cook Mountain and back down Fourth of July Creek. It's 87 miles in all.

But this year could be the last Deyo rides the route. A draft travel management plan released by the Clearwater National Forest last week would close large stretches of trails he likes to travel to motorcycles. The agency is closing the trails to provide security to animals like elk and to protect habitat for fish. But Deyo doesn't believe motorcycles affect elk or trout.

"There has never been a study on the Clearwater forest, as far as I know, that shows elk are killed by motorcycles or the cutthroat trout in Weitas Creek die when they hear a motorcycle go by. I don't know where they get this."

Deyo also said if the trails are closed to motorcycles they may well be effectively closed to everybody. He and some of his riding partners, at the request of the agency, spend time each spring and summer cutting trees out of the trails that have fallen during the previous winter.

"We start as soon as the roads are plowed, cutting windfall out of lower-elevation trails and as the snow melts we work our way up to higher elevations," he said. "I wonder who is going to do the logging out of these trails when the motorcycles are closed out. The Forest Service says they have no money to do it."

The Clearwater's draft travel management plan is receiving mixed reviews, with some all-terrain vehicle riders and environmental groups giving it a thumbs up. But motorcyclists like Deyo say it goes too far and some environmental groups say it doesn't go far enough.

The forest released its draft plan last week that spells out which roads and trails can be used by motor vehicles. The biggest changes are likely to be on trails and long-distance motorcycle riders have the most to lose.

The plan contains three alternatives. Alternative B keeps a liberal amount of trails open, while alternative D closes most trails to ATVs and motorcycles. The third option, alternative C, which is the one preferred by the agency, attempts to strike middle ground.

"Obviously B is the best one for everybody but I don't think C hurts us any. ATVs, it really doesn't affect all too much," said John Erbst of Orofino, who likes to ride ATVs and owns a business that guides ATV riders in the forest.

He said many local ATV groups have a good working relationship with forest officials and have worked with the agency to create new ATV trails at places like Sheep Mountain and Clarke Mountain. "I don't think this new road policy is going to bother that," Erbst said. "I think we will be able to continue to work with them."

The Forest Service nationwide is updating its policy that guides motor vehicle use on national forests. In the past, most forest trails and roads were open unless specifically closed to motorized travel. Under the new policy, each road and trail will be designated open or closed and cross-country travel through the forests will largely be a thing of the past.

Brad Brooks of the Wilderness Society at Boise said the Clearwater's draft plan seems to be on the right track.

"On the whole, I think it strikes a pretty good balance in terms of providing opportunities for everybody. Certainly the plan does well to protect wilderness values and non-motorized recreation values but I do think it provides opportunities for everybody no matter what your interests."

Brooks said his group may take issue with some of the trails the agency has tagged to leave open, but on the whole it is pleased with the plan.

The environmental community is not united in that view. Gary Macfarlane of the Moscow-based Friends of the Clearwater said the plan falls far short of his expectations. He said even alternative D, the one that restricts motorized travel the most, is too liberal.

"Even D, in a couple of places, violates the existing forest plan when meeting elk habitat standards," he said. "We are very disappointed. At least they should have had a baseline that was their existing forest plan and they don't even have that."

Macfarlane also said the plan allows too much snowmobile use in areas important for wolverines and lynx.

In 2007, when the forest began to write the draft plan, it said many of the trails now open to motorcycles could be closed. Forest officials received more than 4,500 comments. Many where from motorcycle riders who wanted long loops left open. Doug Gober, the ranger of the North Fork District, said alternative C was crafted to both protect elk and fish and also leave some long loop opportunities to dirt bikers.

But Deyo said the preferred alternative would leave motorcycle riders with far fewer choices than they have now. They would still be able to ride up Weitas Creek to 12-mile Saddle and down the Windy Ridge Trail to the Cook Mountain Road. But they wouldn't be able to drop into the Fourth of July drainage.

"I'm spoiled," he said. "I've been able to ride a lot of different trails my whole life in the North Fork. I realize times change but not this much at once, I would hope."

A 45-day comment period for the draft plan started last week. But printed maps that show which trails would be open and closed under each alternative have been late to arrive. The comment period may be extended from 45 days starting when the maps become available. The plan is available for viewing at area libraries, Clearwater forest offices and on the Internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/clearwater/ under the link "Travel Planning and OHV Rule." The option requires viewers to have a fast Internet connection.

---

Barker may be contacted at ebarker@lmtribune.com or at (208) 848-2273.

Officials and Agencies - Contacts

This is a useful list of names and addresses that are pertinent to the National Forests and your Democracy.
U.S. ELECTED OFFICIALS

President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: 202-456-1111
Fax: 202-456-2461

Vice President Joseph Biden
Old Executive Office Building
Washington, DC 20501
Phone: 202-456-7125
Fax: 202-456-7044

IDAHO SENATORS/REPRESENTATIVES

Senator Mike Crapo
239 Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-6142
Fax: (202) 228-1375

Senator Jim Risch
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510-1203
Phone: 202-224-2752
Fax: 202-2242573

Rep. Walt Minnick (1st District)
1517 Longworth HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6611
Fax: (202) 225-3029


FOREST SERVICE OFFICIALS

Clearwater National Forest
Rick Brazell, Forest Supervisor
12730 Highway 12
Orofino, Idaho 83544
(208) 476-4541

Nez Perce National Forest:
Rick Brazell, Forest Supervisor
1005 Highway 13
Grangeville ID 83530
(208) 983-1950

Idaho Panhandle NF
Ranotta McNair, Forest Supervisor
3815 Schreiber Way
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815-8363
(208) 765-7223
FAX: (208)765-7307

Board of Directors

President: Will Boyd, Moscow, Idaho
Former Education & Outreach Director for Friends of the Clearwater, Will is the father of three boys, a husband, and is currently employed as a carpenter. He earned his B.S. in Biology from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point and did graduate work in forest ecology and ornithology at North Carolina State University. Will loves being with his family in the Clearwater wildlands, especially the roadless country of the North Fork, while camping, swimming, hiking, hunting, and learning more about wildland ecology.

Vice President: Jill Johnson, Moscow, Idaho
Jill first became active in environmental issues when a mining project threatened the Wolf River in northern Wisconsin. She moved to Moscow in 2002, after many years of education and training in the upper Midwest, and is now an Assistant Professor of Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry at the University of Idaho.

Secretary: Wes Bescom, Moscow, Idaho

Treasurer: Jeanne McHale, Moscow, Idaho

Jeanne McHale is a Professor of Chemistry at Washington State University and has lived in Idaho for 30 years. Raised in the midwest, she moved to Salt Lake City for graduate studies in Physical Chemistry at the University of Utah.  On the way to earning a PhD in 1979, the great Wasatch mountains and the natural beauty of Utah inspired a longstanding love of the outdoors.  Her present research uses spectroscopy to study the harvesting and utilization of solar energy, including investigations of natural plant pigments as sensitizers for solar photovoltaics.  She enjoys cross-country skiing, bicycling, hiking, and playing music.  She lives on Moscow Mountain with her husband Fritz Knorr and commutes to work in Pullman WA by bicycle as often as possible.

Jim Tarter, Moscow, Idaho
Jim is a Professor of English in the Humanities Division and Director of the Writing Program at Lewis-Clark State College in Lewiston, Idaho, where he teaches courses in environmental, Native American, and multi-ethnic literature. He has resided in Moscow since 2001.

Tabitha Brown, Moscow, Idaho

After earning her M.S. in Soil Science at Washington State University in 2006, Tabitha is currently working as a local soil conservationist. She is an avid backpacker and member of the Soil Science Society of America, with whom she previously served as a science policy intern.

Chris Norden, Moscow, Idaho
A board member since late 1999, Chris is a Professor of English and Interdisciplinary Studies at Lewis-Clark State College in Lewiston, Idaho. He received his B.A. and M.A. from the University of Virginia and his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Steve Paulson, Lenore, Idaho
The founder of Friends of the Clearwater, Steve is a fourth-generation Idahoan and a life-long subsistence farmer, hunter, and fisherman. He has served as a U.S. Marine, a smokejumper for the Forest Service, and a registered nurse with a B.S. in Nursing. Steve initiated the Cove Mallard Campaign, the Gray Wolf Committee, and the Clearwater Forest Watch and has written several Endangered Species Act petitions, too many timber sale appeals to count, and plenty of comments on public land management activities. He has also been arrested for non-violent civil disobedience while protesting on Forest Service land. In his free time, Steve sails his 28-foot Cape Dory sloop, presently berthed at Lago Isabel. He has sailed from Maine to Guatemala and from New York to Europe with his wife and friend Susan Nelson.

Diane Prorak, Moscow, Idaho

Diane Prorak has lived in the Clearwater country for over 20 years after growing up in the Midwest. She was attracted out here partly by the large green areas on the Idaho map. She and her husband have hiked a lot of the Clearwater country and were involved in a group, Clearwater Forest Watch, that appealed some key timber sales a number of years ago. She is also a librarian at the University of Idaho and wants to make sure there is wild Clearwater country left for her two children.

Clearwater Wolves Targeted for First ESA 10(j) Rule Killings

2009-02-15
Northern Rockies Grey Wolf


In January 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) adopted the revised regulations of section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This new rule substantially supports justifications for killing reintroduced, endangered gray wolves to nominally protect herds of elk, deer, and other wild ungulates in the Northern Rockies.

Prior section 10(j) regulations, adopted in 2005, allowed states and tribes to kill wolves if they caused "unacceptable impacts" on an ungulate herd or population. The involved agencies were required to document both a decline in ungulate numbers and wolf predation as the primary source of this loss. The revised ESA section 10(j) regulations, however, eliminate these requirements and instead hold as their major criteria only the failure of a wild ungulate population to meet management objectives and wolves as one of the major causes. The new rule greatly expands the definition of unacceptable impacts to include wolf effects on ungulate behavior, movements, nutrition, cow-calf ratios, and other characteristics beyond population size. State or tribal managers are authorized to kill wolves to accommodate "appropriate" ungulate management goals, even those developed to reduce or eliminate predators in areas with plentiful game animals. Moreover, the modified 10(j) regulations allow not just landowners and federally permitted agents but also any citizen to kill wolves caught attacking their livestock or domestic animals.

All of these provisions were devised in tandem with the first USFWS wolf delisting rule, as stop-gap measures that promote the most effective form of wolf depletion – state agent killing – in case delisting of Northern Rockies wolves does not proceed. Implementation of state wildlife department proposals to reduce wolf numbers under the previous 10(j) regulations was thwarted by several factors. First, despite the presence of a recovering wolf population, most elk populations in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have not only increased to all-time highs but have exceeded current statewide objectives. Second, wolves are neither the sole predator nor the primary cause of any ungulate population decreases or negative trends in the Northern Rockies, as other factors, such as extreme weather, habitat quality and quantity, and hunter depletion, may also contribute to declines. The Fish and Wildlife Service asserts that the new 10(j) rule is necessary because the prior regulations required "unattainable" thresholds for wolf impacts before state agents could justify wolf killing. Even though a federal court found USFWS wolf recovery goals insufficient to foster genetic interchange and its subsequent delisting plan arbitrary, the agency nonetheless avers that wolf mortality encouraged by the revised 10(j) regulations will not impede recovery if each state maintains 20 breeding pairs and 200 wolves of the approximately 1,500 wolves presently in the region.

Because USFWS must approve state and tribal determinations of unacceptable wolf impacts under the new 10(j) rule, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) has asked its permission to kill wolves in the Lolo management zone of the upper Clearwater River basin, to supposedly protect elk and deer herds. According to Fred Trevey, an Idaho Fish and Game commissioner in Lewiston, the request initiates a contingency plan formulated to advance state wolf reductions if the Northern Rockies population retained federal protections under the current regulatory review process and future decisions of the Obama administration. On November 6, 2008, mere days after the national election selected a more environmentally responsible administration, the Idaho Fish and Game Commission issued six Wolf Management Directives, one of which authorizes IDFG:

"To develop and aggressively utilize all tools and methods available under the new 10(j) Rule to control wolves in critical areas that are impacting ungulates, starting with the Lolo zone and progressing to other critical areas, in the event delisting does not occur."

Idaho Fish and Game Director Cal Groen believes that his agency can provide the scientific proof that wolves are significantly impacting elk in the Clearwater basin. If IDFG can also demonstrate how these elk are not meeting population objectives set by wildlife managers, USFWS could grant the state authority to kill all but the 200 wolves required throughout the state by the federal wolf recovery plan. Elected Idaho officials support these malevolent wolf-control plans and continue to push for ultimate, if not immediate, removal of Idaho wolves from the federal endangered species list. Representative Walt Minnick, Senator Jim Risch, and Governor Butch Otter are working to convince Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and the Obama administration that Idaho is prepared to manage wolves and that delisting should proceed. Otter has pledged to enlist the support of other Western states and produce a letter from their governors to the new administration explaining the wolf situation and urging delisting. IDFG is also encouraging Salazar to move forward with delisting on the premises that minimum wolf recovery has occurred and that approved state wolf management plans are sufficient to sustain wolves.

The Idaho Department of Fish and Game has not yet formally and publicly documented its specific plans to deplete the Clearwater population of wolves. On December 18, 2008, Friends of the Clearwater (FOC) wrote to Steve Nadeau, the IDFG Large Carnivore Program Manager in Boise, requesting information related to wolf predation of elk in the Lolo zone. In accordance with the Idaho Public Records Act, we asked for various data from the Lolo and Selway management zones pertaining to cow elk losses, elk mortality last winter, and the range condition, trend, and carrying capacity of elk habitat. FOC also inquired about the methods that IDFG employs to determine its elk population objectives, the causes and predator species sources of elk death, and wolf population numbers and density. We additionally requested records of communication between IDFG and the Forest Service associated with witnessed helicopter landings in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness to presumably facilitate wolf census data collection. In response, on January 8, 2009, FOC received an IDFG letter that explained the calculation method used to estimate wolf densities and referred us to online documents, including their Wolf Management Directives as well as their Wolf Conservation and Management in Idaho Progress Report 2007, available at their website: http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/cms/wildlife/wolves/manage.

On February 2, 2009, Friends of the Clearwater, along with other conservation groups represented by Earthjustice, reopened and requested a summary judgment of a lawsuit contesting the revised 10(j) rule. This case was suspended last summer after the same federal district court in Missoula ordered a preliminary injunction of the first wolf delisting plan. The plaintiffs hope to resolve the legality of this latest threat to wolves, especially with the possibility of dozens, if not hundreds, of IDFG-imposed wolf deaths looming over the Clearwater basin. We will continue to closely monitor IDFG’s plans and future USFWS delisting attempts, so that wolf packs in Clearwater wildlands and throughout the Northern Rockies can thrive and attain realistic recovery. We would also appreciate your efforts to persuade Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to retain endangered species status for regional wolves and to revoke the recent changes to the Endangered Species Act section 10(j) regulations. Please contact him by mail at: Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Washington DC 20240, or by phone at: 202-208-7351.

 

Syndicate content