Action Alerts

Cyclist finds flaws in forest travel plan

2009-07-24

Cyclist finds flaws in forest travel plan

July 23rd, 2009, copyright Lewiston Tribune, written by Eric Barker

Alan Deyo, of Orofino, has a favorite motorcycle ride on the Clearwater National Forest.

He starts near Bungalow on the North Fork of the Clearwater River and rides up and across Pot Mountain to Mush Saddle. From there he rides past Cold Springs Peak and Elizabeth Mountain before dropping down to the Black Canyon Road. He rides up Kelly Creek and the Junction Mountain Trail to Windy Ridge and eventually to Cook Mountain and back down Fourth of July Creek. It's 87 miles in all.

But this year could be the last Deyo rides the route. A draft travel management plan released by the Clearwater National Forest last week would close large stretches of trails he likes to travel to motorcycles. The agency is closing the trails to provide security to animals like elk and to protect habitat for fish. But Deyo doesn't believe motorcycles affect elk or trout.

"There has never been a study on the Clearwater forest, as far as I know, that shows elk are killed by motorcycles or the cutthroat trout in Weitas Creek die when they hear a motorcycle go by. I don't know where they get this."

Deyo also said if the trails are closed to motorcycles they may well be effectively closed to everybody. He and some of his riding partners, at the request of the agency, spend time each spring and summer cutting trees out of the trails that have fallen during the previous winter.

"We start as soon as the roads are plowed, cutting windfall out of lower-elevation trails and as the snow melts we work our way up to higher elevations," he said. "I wonder who is going to do the logging out of these trails when the motorcycles are closed out. The Forest Service says they have no money to do it."

The Clearwater's draft travel management plan is receiving mixed reviews, with some all-terrain vehicle riders and environmental groups giving it a thumbs up. But motorcyclists like Deyo say it goes too far and some environmental groups say it doesn't go far enough.

The forest released its draft plan last week that spells out which roads and trails can be used by motor vehicles. The biggest changes are likely to be on trails and long-distance motorcycle riders have the most to lose.

The plan contains three alternatives. Alternative B keeps a liberal amount of trails open, while alternative D closes most trails to ATVs and motorcycles. The third option, alternative C, which is the one preferred by the agency, attempts to strike middle ground.

"Obviously B is the best one for everybody but I don't think C hurts us any. ATVs, it really doesn't affect all too much," said John Erbst of Orofino, who likes to ride ATVs and owns a business that guides ATV riders in the forest.

He said many local ATV groups have a good working relationship with forest officials and have worked with the agency to create new ATV trails at places like Sheep Mountain and Clarke Mountain. "I don't think this new road policy is going to bother that," Erbst said. "I think we will be able to continue to work with them."

The Forest Service nationwide is updating its policy that guides motor vehicle use on national forests. In the past, most forest trails and roads were open unless specifically closed to motorized travel. Under the new policy, each road and trail will be designated open or closed and cross-country travel through the forests will largely be a thing of the past.

Brad Brooks of the Wilderness Society at Boise said the Clearwater's draft plan seems to be on the right track.

"On the whole, I think it strikes a pretty good balance in terms of providing opportunities for everybody. Certainly the plan does well to protect wilderness values and non-motorized recreation values but I do think it provides opportunities for everybody no matter what your interests."

Brooks said his group may take issue with some of the trails the agency has tagged to leave open, but on the whole it is pleased with the plan.

The environmental community is not united in that view. Gary Macfarlane of the Moscow-based Friends of the Clearwater said the plan falls far short of his expectations. He said even alternative D, the one that restricts motorized travel the most, is too liberal.

"Even D, in a couple of places, violates the existing forest plan when meeting elk habitat standards," he said. "We are very disappointed. At least they should have had a baseline that was their existing forest plan and they don't even have that."

Macfarlane also said the plan allows too much snowmobile use in areas important for wolverines and lynx.

In 2007, when the forest began to write the draft plan, it said many of the trails now open to motorcycles could be closed. Forest officials received more than 4,500 comments. Many where from motorcycle riders who wanted long loops left open. Doug Gober, the ranger of the North Fork District, said alternative C was crafted to both protect elk and fish and also leave some long loop opportunities to dirt bikers.

But Deyo said the preferred alternative would leave motorcycle riders with far fewer choices than they have now. They would still be able to ride up Weitas Creek to 12-mile Saddle and down the Windy Ridge Trail to the Cook Mountain Road. But they wouldn't be able to drop into the Fourth of July drainage.

"I'm spoiled," he said. "I've been able to ride a lot of different trails my whole life in the North Fork. I realize times change but not this much at once, I would hope."

A 45-day comment period for the draft plan started last week. But printed maps that show which trails would be open and closed under each alternative have been late to arrive. The comment period may be extended from 45 days starting when the maps become available. The plan is available for viewing at area libraries, Clearwater forest offices and on the Internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/clearwater/ under the link "Travel Planning and OHV Rule." The option requires viewers to have a fast Internet connection.

---

Barker may be contacted at ebarker@lmtribune.com or at (208) 848-2273.

Timber Sale Monitoring

Verification Hike

Timber Sale Monitoring is one of the most interesting and successful parts of what we do. History has proven conclusively that the Federal Services charged with protection of the wildland resources need some close watching.

Timber Sale Monitoring is the process of making a verified observation of the actual scope of timber cuts and documenting, reporting, ensuring, following through, and maintaining a presence to facilitate the revolution in thinking required to make ours a healthy planet.

We get to do that on the ground, in the woods and from computer screens, now that the technology is emerging into our daily lives. Gary Macfarlane, FOC's forest watch director, provides workshops dedicated to teaching the "in's and outs" of timber sale monitoring from start to finish. Contact Gary at gary@friendsoftheclearwater.org

We are working to bring you detailed, high resolution imagery of the Clearwater Forest in as near to realtime as possible over the coming months. Even now though, you can see clearly the devastating effects of 'clearcut forestry' that your US Forest Service supports and encourages.

Officials and Agencies - Contacts

This is a useful list of names and addresses that are pertinent to the National Forests and your Democracy.
U.S. ELECTED OFFICIALS

President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: 202-456-1111
Fax: 202-456-2461

Vice President Joseph Biden
Old Executive Office Building
Washington, DC 20501
Phone: 202-456-7125
Fax: 202-456-7044

IDAHO SENATORS/REPRESENTATIVES

Senator Mike Crapo
239 Dirksen Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-6142
Fax: (202) 228-1375

Senator Jim Risch
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510-1203
Phone: 202-224-2752
Fax: 202-2242573

Rep. Walt Minnick (1st District)
1517 Longworth HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6611
Fax: (202) 225-3029


FOREST SERVICE OFFICIALS

Clearwater National Forest
Rick Brazell, Forest Supervisor
12730 Highway 12
Orofino, Idaho 83544
(208) 476-4541

Nez Perce National Forest:
Rick Brazell, Forest Supervisor
1005 Highway 13
Grangeville ID 83530
(208) 983-1950

Idaho Panhandle NF
Ranotta McNair, Forest Supervisor
3815 Schreiber Way
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815-8363
(208) 765-7223
FAX: (208)765-7307

Behind closed doors "Clearwater Collaborative" touted as THE legitimate path by former Forest Service Chief, invalidating public participation

Editor's Note: This is the first of many articles to come regarding the "collaboration" effort that has been happening behind closed doors here on the Clearwater. The public has been entirely excluded from this process as have many groups with a public interest. The public participation process that is dismissed by former Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth in the article below is required by law and is an essential part of the publicly transparent and democratic process that keeps land management agencies accountable. This exclusive and arbitrarily formed decision-making body assumes that National Forests should be controlled by local citizens, not by all Americans.

Group urged to work together on national forest issues

by Eric Barker, Lewiston Morning Tribune

Oct. 29, 2009

KAMIAH - Former Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth said trying to make a decision using the agency's public involvement process is like driving a bus where all the passengers have a brake.

If the driver tries to turn right, somebody steps on the brake. If the driver turns left or goes straight, the brake gets pushed. In the case of the Forest Service, the figurative brake is an appeal or lawsuit launched to stop an agency action. The passengers represent the public and all its diverse interests.

"Until the people on the bus all decide where they want to go, the bus doesn't go anywhere," he said. (emphasis added)

Bosworth made the remark while speaking to members of the Clearwater Basin Collaborative in Kamiah Wednesday.

The collaborative is a diverse group of people with interests in the management of the Clearwater and Nez Perce national forests. They are trying to fashion an agreement that solves previously acrimonious land management issues, while protecting sensitive landscapes and species, helping local timber economies and fostering diverse recreational use of the land. Collaborative members have been meeting for more than a year and trying to parlay mutual trust into just such an agreement.

Rick Brazell, the new supervisor of the Clearwater and Nez Perce forests, also attended and spoke at the meeting. Brazell cited collaboration on the Colville National Forest, his former post, which has seen an unprecedented period of calm punctuated by no appeals or litigation over major projects during the past six years.

Brazell told the group he couldn't take credit for the Colville's track record. Instead he gave credit to a dedicated collection of people who worked with the agency to build consensus on major projects.

"It was folks like you around the room that made that happen," he said. "What you have going here has the potential to be so great. It takes a lot of work up front. It takes a lot of energy but at the end of the day we get more done."

Bosworth, who served as district ranger at Powell in the 1970s and later as regional forester at Missoula, Mont., said he has been hearing about the Clearwater Collaborative from members Dale Harris of the Great Burn Study Group and Orville Daniels of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

"I was sort of in disbelief. I said 'Really, we are talking about the Clearwater?' "

He, like many of the participants, lived and worked through decades of strife among competing interests on the two forests.

"If it can be done here on the Clearwater, it can be done anywhere in the country," he said.

But Bosworth cautioned collaboration is difficult and time consuming. He said participants have to be in it for the long run and they have to build respect for other members of the groups and their goals and desires.

"Without respect, you really can't get anywhere with collaboration," he said. "I think that is why it takes so long."

During a question-and-answer period of the meeting, several collaborative members asked Bosworth and Brazell how to turn consensus around a table into action on the ground. Bosworth said if true agreement is reached the action will happen. He also said money will flow to forests that can get projects accomplished.

"I believe money still goes where success happens," he said. "I think success breeds success and success breeds money. Who wants to send money to a place that just does more planning?"

Others asked if they could count on a buy-in from Forest Service employees, who they feared might stall or delay projects they might not agree with. For example, Heather Leach of the Idaho Department of Labor at Orofino asked if anything could be done if a district ranger refused to implement a project the group and Forest Service leaders had agreed upon.

"In my view, if we come to an agreement and a district ranger doesn't want it to happen, I'm going to get a new district ranger," Bosworth said.

His answer brought laughter from the group members who quickly turned to Brazell for his interpretation.

"What he said," shot back the forest supervisor.

He followed up by saying it's his job to create an environment where the idea of collaboration is accepted within the agency. (emphasis added)

But he also said Forest Service leaders have to be the ones that make decisions.

Daniels, a former Forest Service employee said agency employees often feel like they have hundreds of bosses pulling them in different directions. If the public presents a clear vision of what they want the forest to look like, agency employees will appreciate it.

---

Barker may be contacted at ebarker@lmtribune.com or at (208) 848-2273.
Syndicate content